Trent N. Cash

Ph.D. Student at Carnegie Mellon University

Linking knowledge justification with peers to the learning of social perspective taking


Journal article


Saetbyul Kim, Tzu-Jung Lin, Michael Glassman, Seung Yon Ha, Ziye Wen, Manisha Nagpal, Trent N. Cash, Elizabeth Kraatz
Journal of Moral Education, 2023, Advanced Online Publication.


View PDF
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Kim, S., Lin, T.-J., Glassman, M., Ha, S. Y., Wen, Z., Nagpal, M., … Kraatz, E. (2023). Linking knowledge justification with peers to the learning of social perspective taking. Journal of Moral Education, Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2185597


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Kim, Saetbyul, Tzu-Jung Lin, Michael Glassman, Seung Yon Ha, Ziye Wen, Manisha Nagpal, Trent N. Cash, and Elizabeth Kraatz. “Linking Knowledge Justification with Peers to the Learning of Social Perspective Taking.” Journal of Moral Education (2023): Advanced Online Publication.


MLA   Click to copy
Kim, Saetbyul, et al. “Linking Knowledge Justification with Peers to the Learning of Social Perspective Taking.” Journal of Moral Education, 2023, pp. Advanced Online Publication., doi:10.1080/03057240.2023.2185597.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{saetbyul2023a,
  title = {Linking knowledge justification with peers to the learning of social perspective taking},
  year = {2023},
  journal = {Journal of Moral Education},
  pages = {Advanced Online Publication.},
  doi = {10.1080/03057240.2023.2185597},
  author = {Kim, Saetbyul and Lin, Tzu-Jung and Glassman, Michael and Ha, Seung Yon and Wen, Ziye and Nagpal, Manisha and Cash, Trent N. and Kraatz, Elizabeth}
}

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine whether justifying one’s own social knowledge (moral, societal, psychological) toward complex social-moral issues through collaborative argumentation was associated with the improvement of social perspective taking for elementary students. A total of 129 5th graders (52% female, Mage = 10.98) from six classrooms in two public schools participated in six weekly collaborative small-group discussions to reason about complex social-moral issues such as social exclusion. Two aspects of knowledge justification were examined: the frequency of knowledge justification and the diversity in perspectives. A Poisson regression with Generalized estimation equation (GEE) revealed that frequency of knowledge justification and diversity in perspectives during collaborative argumentation were associated with pre-post changes in students’ social perspective taking, as reflected in individual essays. Findings underscore knowledge justification as a potential mechanism of collaborative argumentation to promote elementary students’ social perspective taking.

Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in